Quantum physics and consciousness pdf
Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation - WikipediaModern Science has, over four centuries, made strides un-witnessed probably in the history of mankind. Scanning through the physical world with all its complications and complexities, the classical mechanics, relativistic mechanics, and quantum mechanics, we have understood the world around us with mathematical precision. At one time, a few decades back, we thought that matter and energy are two independent building bricks of our physical world. However, we progressed to find the matter—energy continuum. As Fritj of Capra has put it, the science is in transition to move to understand the deeper and subtler dimensions of creation to bring into its fold consciousness. Attempts are continuously made to understand the facets of consciousness, spectrum of consciousness, etc. It is in this context, Prof Josephson tells often in his lectures that we need to go beyond quantum physics.
Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation
In attempting to comprehend the atom, physicists outfitted quantum mechanics, the main profitable concept in technology and the root of one-third of our economic climate. Authors Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner clarify all this in non-technical phrases with aid from a few fanciful tales and anecdotes in regards to the theory's builders. They current the quantum secret in truth, emphasizing what's and what's no longer hypothesis. Quantum Enigma's description of the experimental quantum evidence, and the quantum idea explaining them, is undisputed. Rosenblum and Kuttner for that reason flip to exploring realization itself--and come across quantum mechanics. Readers are dropped at a boundary the place the actual services of physicists isn't any longer the single definite consultant.
The purpose of this paper is to argue that researchers interested in studying spirituality may benefit from paying attention to the phenomenon of consciousness. Despite consciousness being integral to human experience, it is largely ignored in research into spirituality. Yet there is evidence to suggest that the study of spirituality, and explorations of consciousness, have much to offer each other. My contention is that the subject of consciousness has not received much attention within mainstream social and educational research, due to the prevailing, often unconscious, influence of Newtonian science, which assumes consciousness to be an epiphenomenon of the brain. However, developments in science, particularly in quantum physics, have shown that the world cannot be explained by Newtonian principles of separation and atomism. At the same time, a growing disillusionment with science has resulted in the emergence of a grassroots spirituality which challenges a materialist scientific paradigm.
The significance of consciousness studies and quantum physics for researching spirituality
Activitas Nervosa Superior. It starts from a first person viewpoint, which may be characterized as Rational German existentialism, in the spirit of Goethe, Von Neumann, Heisenberg, and Raiffa. It rejects the idea that quantum measurement has any connection to the emergent phenomena of consciousness or the soul. Further work building on this foundation rejects the classic formulation of noosphere from De Chardin and Vernadsky, but proposes that an entire species of noospheres permeating our cosmos is plausible under 1 and 2 , and may in fact be the most plausible basis for explaining veridical weird experience for those of us who find it inescapable. It is well known in neuroscience that intense hormones usually suppress the higher centers of the brain, causing something of a regression in thought and in behavior.
The von Neumann—Wigner interpretation , also described as " consciousness causes collapse [of the wave function]", is an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which consciousness is postulated to be necessary for the completion of the process of quantum measurement. In the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation , quantum mechanics predicts only the probabilities for different outcomes of pre-specified observations. What constitutes an "observer" or an "observation" is not directly specified by the theory, and the behavior of a system upon observation is completely different than its usual behavior: the wavefunction that describes a system spreads out into an ever-larger superposition of different possible situations. However, during observation, the wavefunction describing the system collapses to one of several options. If there is no observation, this collapse does not occur, and none of the options ever becomes less likely.